ABSTRACT
Background: Cochlear Implantation (CI) has become an important modality of treatment for children with severe to profoundpre-lingual sensorineural hearing loss who do not benefit from hearing aids (HAs). The final outcome is not totally predictable,as there are a large number of factors which either alone or in combination will play their roles in the final outcome of CI.Aim of the Study: This study aims to evaluate prospectively the relative impact of multiple pre-, peri-, and post-operative factorson the final outcome of the CI in pre-lingual hearing impaired children aged 5 years under “Sruthitharangam” free cochlearimplant program of Government of Kerala.Materials and Methods: This study was conducted at Government Medical College, Kozhikode (GMC-KKD), Kerala, fromJanuary 2014 to January 2015. The study group consisted of 60 patients screened from the patients who have attendedAuditory verbal habilitation (AVH) categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) test, Meaningful auditory integration scale (MAIS)and Speech intelligibility rating test (SIR) at GMC-KKD, Kerala. Counseling of parents was done regarding regular follow-upsand therapy/support to the child at home.Observations and Results: Pearson correlation test and Spearman correlation test were done to check the correlation betweenage at which HA was first fitted and MAIS scores. Correlation between the age at which HA first fitted and MAIS was negative.As the age at which HAs were fitted increases, the MAIS score decreases. This indicates the significance of using the residualhearing and stimulation of auditory nerve as early as possible. Pearson correlation and Spearman correlation tests were appliedto check the correlation between age of surgery and MAIS score and found that there was negative correlation existing betweenage of surgery and MAIS scores. This meant, as the age at which surgery was done increases, the MAIS score decreases.Pearson correlation test and Spearman correlation tests were applied to check the MAIS scores and duration of AVH with HAs.Conclusions: A Cochlear implant was not a passive sensory aid or sensory substitution device that simply replaces a damaged ordefective cochlea to restore normal hearing but requires prolonged period of aural rehabilitation that involves perceptual learning,adaptation, and readjustment of their attention. The various risk factors that affect the auditory gain and speech perception eitheracting singly or in combination and the statistical analysis of the present study showed are the age at implantation, duration ofauditory deprivation, and the residual hearing which have a direct impact on the outcome over a period of 1 year.
ABSTRACT
La presente investigación tiene por objetivo estudiar la correlación entre las habilidades de memoria secuencial auditiva (MSA), integración auditiva (IA) y el desempeño fonológico en 24 niños con trastorno específico del lenguaje (TEL) expresivo de un rango etario de 3 años a 3 años 11 meses que asisten a una escuela especial de lenguaje. Los participantes fueron evaluados mediante la aplicación de dos subtest del Test Illinois de Aptitudes Psicolingüísticas (subtest de MSA y subtest de IA), y el Test para Evaluar los Procesos de Simplificación Fonológica Revisado (TEPROSIF-R). Los resultados muestran una correlación estadísticamente significativa entre memoria secuencial auditiva, integración auditiva y desempeño fonológico. Al analizar los datos dividiendo la muestra en dos grupos etarios se observa que, para el grupo etario de 3 años a 3 años 5 meses existe una correlación estadísticamente significativa entre MSA, IA y desempeño fonológico. En cambio, para el grupo etario de 3 años 6 meses a 3 años 11 meses se observa la misma tendencia sinalcanzar valores estadísticamente significativos. Esto sugiere que la relación entre estas variables disminuye a medida que los niños se acercan a su cuarto año de vida.
The present research aims to study the correlation between auditory sequential memory capacity (ASM), auditory integration (AI) abilities, and phonological performance in 24 children with expressive specific language impairment, with an age range between 3 and 3 years and 11 months, who attend a special language school. Participants were evaluated through two subtests of the Illinois Psycholinguistic Aptitudes Test (an ASM subtest and an AIsubtest), and the Test to Evaluate the Phonological Simplification Processes Revised (TEPROSIF-R). The results indicate a statistically significant correlation between sequential auditory memory, auditory integration and phonological performance. When analyzing the data by dividing the sample into two age groups. When analyzing the data dividing the sample into two age groups, we observed that, for the age group between 3 and 3 years and 5 months there is a statistically significant correlation between auditory sequential memory, auditory integration and phonological performance. For the age group from 3 years 6 months to 3 years 11 months the same trend is observed without reaching statistically significant values. This suggests that the relationship between these variables decreases as children approach their fourth year of life.
Subject(s)
Humans , Child, Preschool , Auditory Perception/physiology , Specific Language Disorder/physiopathology , MemoryABSTRACT
@#BACKGROUND. Over 5% of the world’s population or 466 million people have disabling hearing loss (432 million adults and 34 million children). Profound sensorineural hearing loss and deafness can be treated successfully with a cochlear implant. A cochlear implant (CI) stimulates the auditory nerve, bypassing the defective cochlea, and provides auditory information to the developing brain, thus improving oral language. Children, who receive an early diagnosis of deafness and proper speech rehabilitation, and undergo early cochlear implantation, are able to develop auditory and linguistic skills at par with their hearing peers. METHOD. 6 deaf patients who underwent unilateral Cochlear Implantation at the NCMCH from January 2017 to June 2018 were included in the study. Participants were divided into 3 groups on the basis of age at which participants underwent implantation. RESULTS. Pre-op average MAIS was 1,6/40, Category of Auditory Performance (CAP) - 0,77 and SIR - 0,7/5 in all implanted age groups. Score increased over time to attain average score MAIS -29.6/40, CAP- 3.3/7 SIR-2.7/5 in all implanted groups at one year after implantation. CONCLUSION. There is a need for more research on patient age and gender composition, and outcomes of cochlear implantation and hearing devices in this study population. A robust set of study measures would provide statistical significance. Parent-child relationships affect hearing and speech therapy results, so there’s a need to improve parents’ knowledge regarding these therapies.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to compare receptive and expressive language development in children who have undergone simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation (SCI) and those who have undergone bimodal stimulation (unilateral CI+ hearing aid). SUBJECTS AND METHOD: In a retrospective analysis of clinical data, 15 pediatric patients who have received SCI and nine patients who have received bimodal stimulation (BM group) were enrolled. CI was performed for all patients at 24 months of age. Category of Auditory Performance (CAP) scores, Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS) scores, and developmental quotients (DQ) for expressive and receptive language were compared between the groups at 12 month of follow-up. The Percentage of Consonants Correct (PCC) of children evaluated at 4 years old was also compared. RESULTS: At 12 months of follow-up, significantly greater improvements in CAP scores (Δ4.25±0.5) were noted in the SCI group compared to the BM group (Δ3.56±0.88, p=0.041). Significantly greater improvements in IT-MAIS scores were also noted in the SCI group (Δ36.17±4.09) than in the BM group (Δ30.17±2.91, p=0.004). The DQ of receptive language was higher in the SCI group than in the BM group (87.6±15.4% vs. 75.5±12.0%, p=0.023) at 12 months of follow-up. Moreover, early SCI was associated with better receptive language skills. PCC index of children at 4 years old was higher in the SCI group than in the BM group (88.5±13.2% vs. 62±15.8%, p=0.014). Earlier SCI was associated with even greater improvements. CONCLUSION: Bilateral SCI is associated with significant improvements in language development when compared with bimodal stimulation. Earlier SCI was associated with better outcomes.
Subject(s)
Child , Humans , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Follow-Up Studies , Hearing , Language Development , Linguistics , Methods , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical value of ITMAIS in the early prelingual auditory development (EPLAD)assessment for bilateral profound hearing impaired children with hearing aids.Methods Profound sensorineural hearing impaired children fitted with hearing aids during October 2008 and July 2011 in our center were recruited in this retrospective study, and they would be tested with the ITMAIS at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after hearing aids fitting.A total of 51 children were recruited in the study, and divided into 2 age groups according to the age at fitting, 1 yr group (28 children) and 2 yrs group (23 children).Results The EPLAD of children in both groups improved significantly in the first half of year after fitting (P<0.05).The mean EPLAD levels of children in both groups were close to or achieved the mean level of severe sensorineural hearing impaired children without intervention when they had had the hearing aids for 6 months.Conclusion Hearing aids could help the children with profound sensorineural hearing loss to improve the abilities of EPLAD.ITMAIS is a simple, an effective tool for assessing the early outcome of children with hearing aids, especially for the children who could not cooperate with the behavioral hearing test.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the curative effect of auditory integration training (AIT) on autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in children with abnormal brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP).Methods 56 cases of ASD patients with abnormal BAEP were treated with AIT (aged 2-6 years).BAEP will be reviewed after each course of treatments until the test results were back to normal or had no obvious changes.Children' s core symptoms were evaluated by using autism behavior checklist (ABC) and the childhood autism rating scale (CARS) before and after treatments.Results 56 children accepted (1.95±0.92) courses of AIT.Compared with the data before AIT,CARS scores ((36.32± 3.54),(34.11 ± 3.12)),scores of the sensory factor((5.65±4.61),(4.28±4.11)) and the stereotypes factor of ABC were decreased significantly(P＜0.05).After treatments,BAEP of 29 cases (51.79％) went back to normal levels.The bilateral wave incubation periods on left side (Ⅰ:(1.81 ± 0.17) ms,(1.71 ± 0.12) ms,Ⅲ:(4.14 ± 0.18) ms,(4.07 ±0.17)ms,V:(6.09±0.23)ms,(5.97±0.22) ms)and right side (Ⅰ:(1.79±0.17) ms,(1.74±0.13) ms,Ⅲ:(4.15±0.16) ms,(4.07±0.16) ms,V:(6.06±0.23) ms,(5.99±0.26) ms) were significantly shortened (P＜ 0.05).Conclusion AIT can improve the functional handicap of auditory pathway in brainstem of ASD children,and the core symptoms of ASD.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the auditory and verbal abilities of cochlear implantees using question_naires ,to explore basic rules of the development of auditory and verbal abilities ,and to analyze their relationships with some influencing factors .Methods A retrospective analysis of 107 cases of pre-lingually deaf children with cochlear implantation was conducted with Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale/Meaningful Audi_tory Integration Scale (IT -MAIS/MAIS) ,categories of auditory performance (CAP) and speech intelligibility rat_ing (SIR) for the evaluation of auditory and verbal abilities .An analysis was performed to assess influencing fac_tors ,such as postoperative time ,age at implantation ,physical age at follow -up ,time with hearing aids before im_plantation .SAS 9 .1 .3 was used in statistical analysis .ResuIts A total of 107 pre-lingually deaf children (48 males and 59 females) participated in this study .The postoperative time ranged from 0 to 49 months ,with an average of 9 .0 ± 10 .9 months .The results showed the postoperative time and age at implantation had significant influences on the scores of IT -MAIS/MAIS ,and postoperative time and physical age at follow -up had significant influences on the scores of CAP/SIR (P0 .05) .ConcIusion The ages at implantation ,postoperative time and physical age had significant influences on the auditory and verbal abilities of pre-lingually deaf children with cochlear implanta_tion .Further studies are needed to explore their relationships with hearing aids usage before implantation .
ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the effects of auditory integration training on language development delay in mental retardation chil-dren. Methods 40 cases were devided into observation group (n=20) and control group (n=20). All the children accepted speech training, while the observation group accepted auditory integration training in addition. They were assessed with the development quotient (DQ) of adaptability and language of Gesell developmental schedules before and 6 months after treatment. Results DQ of adaptability and language improved after treatment in both groups (P<0.05), and improved more in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). Conclu-sion Auditory integration training may further improve the language development in mental retardation children.